Home

Aug. 3rd, 2007

not a pretty girl

Not A Feminist By Birth Or Biology

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

I’ve been over at Feministing all day, writing responses to “You learn something new every day.” The post is a response to The BBC’s recent coverage of a debate with Julie Bindel. Julie believes that sex reassignment surgery is a “mutilation.”

The debate over there is one of the best I’ve ever encountered. There’s a whole lot of cross talk and listening, and very few personal attacks. This is the first time I’ve ever posted about this in a forum where I didn’t feel like I was talking to a wall.

I’ve included some of the comments, and my responses, under the cut.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jul. 27th, 2007

not a pretty girl

As If You Needed Any More Proof: Randi Rhodes III

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

From the Wednesday, July 25th edition of the Randi Rhodes Show

When someone apologizes for a “bad joke” and understands their mistake by making the following comment…

” This is my second attempt at posting a reply because I feel awful about your PERCEPTION of who I am. Can YOU imagine that? Being misunderstood? I am honesty sorry if my attempt at humor failed.” - Randi Rhodes”

Would they continue to air this?

http://www.transadvocate.com/audio/Annisaman.mp3

I think not.

Jul. 26th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Wyoming (IN)Equality

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

What the heck is up with Wyoming Equality? From their front page:

wyequalty.jpg

An equality group is promoting The Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival? For those that don’t know, the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival is a “womyn born womyn” event that specifically excludes transwomen. In recent years they’ve softened their “no transwomen” policy from “DO NOT ENTER,” to “WE TOLD YOU NOT TO ENTER, BUT YOU CAN BUY A TICKET.” If you don’t believe the politics behind Michfest is transphobic, just take a look at one of the scheduled events, a screening of ““The Gendercator

Susan Stryker described the film this way:

“The ideas in the film echo the rhetoric of Janice Raymond’s Transsexual Empire (1979), which goes so far as to claim that Nazis invented transsexual surgery, that transsexuals are agents of a patriarchal conspiracy to replace biologically female women, to accuse all transsexuals of being rapists (because they represent an “unwanted penetration” of women’s space), and to argue in a eugenic fashion that transsexuals should be “morally mandated out of existence.”

Raymond’s book, and the film, engage in the paranoid fantasy that what transsexuals do to their own bodies is somehow a threat to the bodies of nontranssexual women, that the very existence of transsexuals will somehow “force” a nontranssexual woman to have her body violated through some sort of compulsory and unwanted transformation–it’s the same structure of fantasy that imagines that all black men want to rape white women, that gays are predatory pedophiles, that communists are secretly infiltrating our government, that terrorists are swarming across our borders, that drug pushers are constantly trying to hook our kids, and so on ad nauseum. The film projects fear onto an “alien other” and then condemns that other for reflecting back that fear to the person who has projected it there in the first place.”

I can’t understand how any group that espouses “equality for all” could support Michfest. Their anti-trans policy is nothing short of separate but equal.

Jul. 25th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Woman’s Space To Hate With Heart

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

Things I learn from the radical feminist blogosphere:

-” Male-to-female transsexuality/transgender is really about men’s rights. It has nothing to do with feminism. As such, as feminists, just as we oppose men’s rights, in general, we oppose this manifestation of men’s rights as well.”

- “Radical feminists are no more “transphobes” than we are “manhaters.” To allege that we are is to indulge in sexist, misogynist, anti-feminist propaganda.”

- ” Female-to-male transsexuals/transgendered persons are situated much differently than male-to-female transsexuals/transgendered persons. Transmen have not enjoyed male privilege for any of the years they lived as females and as women, and they never enjoy male privilege as men do. When radical feminists call out transpersons, we are calling them out on their sexism. This means that most of the time, we are calling out transwomen or trans-identified men, not transmen. “

-”Male-to-female transsexuality/transgender is really about men’s rights. It has nothing to do with feminism. As such, as feminists, just as we oppose men’s rights, in general, we oppose this manifestation of men’s rights as well.”

-” Male to female transsexuals/transgendered persons have enjoyed male privilege, for all of the time that they have moved and lived in the world as males or continue to. To call them out for their sexism whenever we see it, find it, hear of it, know of it, are targeted by it, are impacted and affected by it is not “transphobic.” It is feminism.”

Apparently when Heart’s site visits go down, she needs to suck the life of transpeople, like a vampire sucks blood.  Bite, suck, repeat.

There are two rules in when engaging in honest debate:

1. reveal errors or omissions in your opponent’s facts
2. reveal errors or omissions in your opponent’s logic

That’s difficult to do, because there are no facts to reveal. It’s almost all dogma.  A commenter disagreed. I responded:

“Dogma:
1. a doctrine or code of beliefs accepted as authoritative.
2. a religious doctrine that is proclaimed as true without proof

You have no empirical data to support your position, so it IS dogma. It’s a belief, based on an opinion, supported by faith.”

That’s it in a nutshell, for me. You can’t debate someone that brings only dogma. Belief isn’t debatable.

not a pretty girl

There’s Something About Transphobia

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

I’m continually amazed at the hatred and bigotry shown by the Fox Broadcasting Network. The fall lineup includes the inherently transphobic series, “There’s Something About Miriam.” The series first aired in the 2004 in the UK and features six men who try to win the affection of 21-year-old Mexican model Miriam. In the final episode it is revealed to the suitors that Miriam is a preoperative transsexual woman.

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ACJL41x3QE" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

The series originally ran in the UK and was widely condemned by the media as “the cruelest reality show idea yet.” The contestants sued claiming that Brighter Pictures had committed conspiracy to commit sexual assault, defamation, breach of contract and personal injury in the form of psychological and emotional damage. The case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

The show portrays transgender people as deceitful sexual perverts who get their jollies by preying on unsuspecting men. It’s the same type of voyeurism and “gotcha” exploitation that killed Scott Amedure. Amedure appeared on a taping of the Jenny Jones Show, revealing his “gay crush” on Jonathan Schmitz. Three days later Scmitz bought a shotgun and went to Amedure’s home and murdered him. In the trial that followed, the defense tried to blame Amedure for his own murder. This type of panic strategy was also used in the murder trial of a transgender teen, Gwen Araujo.

When media giants like Fox use transgender people in such a “Jerry Springer” kind of way, it serves to perpetuate negative stereotypes that will have a negative impact for years after the program airs.

H/T to NG and Roger Catlin

Jul. 3rd, 2007

not a pretty girl

Randi Rhodes’ Transphobic Moment

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

tap.gif

Listening to “progressive radio,” you don’t really hear to many examples of out and out transphobia. Listening to Randi Rhodes on Air America Radio I heard her mock Ann Coulter, insinuating she was a transsexual. This is insulting to Ann Coulter on a purely personal level, and it’s demeaning of anyone trans because of the stereotypes.
Just goes to show you that ignorance, bigotry, and transphobia isn’t exclusive to right wing Republicans.

http://podcasts.transactivists.com/TAR/media/2007-07-03_tacoulterrhodes.mp3

Jun. 15th, 2007

not a pretty girl

What’s In A Word? Context, Ya Fag!

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

I know I have this obsession with words. I’ve never particularly liked Queerty.com because it’s posts on transfolk generally border on bad taste/transphobia. The most recent edition sports this headline:

queerty.jpg

When I think of the use of the word tranny, I think of the words of George Carlin:

[kml_flashembed movie=”http://lads.myspace.com/videos/vplayer.swf” width=”430″ height=”346″ fvars=”m=598001949;type=video”/]

The point being, if you are a transgender person and you say tranny, it’s acceptable because the intent isn’t negative or hateful. But if your not, it’s a bigoted and derogatory thing to say. My son is gay, and I hear him call his gay friends “homo and fag” all the time. I know he’s not homophobic, BECAUSE HE’S GAY!

“You throw that football like a girl!” The previous sentence has no “fag,” no “queer,” or any other “bad word” in it. But the connotation is that being a women are weak, frail, and unable to physically throw a football. It is the person saying the words and the context that they are used that make them “good” or “bad” words.

While I don’t suggest that anyone should use words like fag, tranny, or any other “tainted” words, I don’t think that when they are used by someone in target group the word is supposed to represent, they aren’t meant to hurt.

As always, context is king.

Jun. 8th, 2007

not a pretty girl

It’s All Greek To Me: The Transgender - Homosexuality Death Match

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

In reading the recently published “Interview: Transgenderism Emerging on the Heels of Homosexuality in Media” at the Christian Post, I sat amazed with my mouth agape at the following statement.

“When you look at Scripture for example, when Paul talks in 1 Corinthians 6:9 about the following group of people will not inherit the Kingdom of God. One of those groups of people he calls the “soft men.” Now the meaning of that essentially, in its historical context, is men who feminize themselves to attract male sex partners. And that’s the closest thing you have in the ancient world to transgenderism. Paul lists them among the group of people who risk not being included in the Kingdom.”

For years conservative Christians have used 1Corinthians 6:9 to prove that homosexuality is a sin. In using 1Corinthians 6:9 in the above context, they are confirming the view that the verse isn’t about homosexuality. For years liberal churches like the MCC church have argued the fine points of the Greek words used in 6:9 (malakoi, malakee, and arsenokoitai instead of the word paiderasste).

The question of usage is unclear, but one thing is not. This verse either relates to homosexuality or effeminate behavior, but NOT both. If they use this passage as a way to deny transgender people a place in the church, they leave the back door wide open for gays and lesbians.

These types of attacks on transgender people are by conservative Christians who don’t care about theology or about scripture. They are simply trying to find a way to further their hatred and bigotry.

Jun. 5th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Confessions of A Ex-Ex-Transgender

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

You’ve probably heard of the ex-gay movement. You may have even heard of the ex-ex-gay movement. Odds are slim that you know anyone that is ex-transgender. But have you ever known anyone that is ex-ex-transgender?

You have if you’ve read this blog.

In 1997 I confessed to my wife that I’d cross-dressed most of my life. After her initial shock wore off, she began to accept and integrate this part of me into our marriage. This was an activity that I’d never told anyone about, much less participate in with another person in. In late 1997 I began to realize that I might not be a crossdresser, but that something deeper was hidden underneath all the shame. My wife, the love of my life, had told me in no uncertain terms that if I was a bisexual or transsexual, our marriage would be over. Those two facts were playing a tug of war in my mind for months that caused me to go into a cycle of depression. In January of 1999 things finally came to a head, this looming thing was something I knew that I couldn’t hide from myself any longer. Crying curled up in a ball in the middle of my bed, I realized I couldn’t rid myself of this. I didn’t want to die, but I couldn’t keep living this way. In the desperation of the moment, I cried out to God.

For the next two years, I dove head first into the bible. I joined Horizon Christian Fellowship South, led by Pastor Tony Smith. The church was very bible centered, and the services were more educational than they were emotional. My days and nights away from the church, my head was either stuck in a bible, or on the net researching and or debating theology.

I felt part of my call was to evangelize online with other men that had suffered through gender dysphoria and were struggling with this sin. It was the early days of the Internet then, blogs were still years away. The only place you could freely post your thoughts were either on AOL discussion boards, or on Usenet. I started a group over at Dejanews.com called Nikao (which in Greek means overcome, conquer, or victory). I spent hours writing and debating on Usenet, the power of Christ’s redeeming love. My growing obsession blossomed and I decided it was time to start making preparations for Bible College.

The very thing I thought would save my marriage, doomed it. The deeper I immersed myself into Christ, the angrier my wife became. She said “you’re just replacing one part of your life with another. As long as you are in that group (Nikao) you’re still in it, just from a different angle.” She saw how radically it effected my behavior, turning me into someone she couldn’t stand to be around. On August 25th, of 2000, the wheels fell off our marriage. My wife of six years hated me so much she physically assaulted me. Her assault and time in jail solidified the end of our marriage.

In the traumatic days that followed, members of my church were supportive, albeit, distant. With the impending divorce and custody battle, I leaned on my pastor for guidance and support. In my fight for custody, I asked him to go to court with me. Knowing that my wife would play the transvestite defense, I asked him to stand before the court and testify to my church activities and my attendance. He told me he would “pray about it” and get back with me. He never did. Needless to say, I lost custody of my daughter.

In November of 2000, I started seeing a therapist about my gender issues. One of the most profound concepts she ever taught me was the difference between desire and action. She said something to the effect that “you can modify your actions, but you can’t modify your desires.” Desire is a physical response to an external stimuli. You can say you don’t like chocolate, but you can’t make your mouth stop watering when you smell it. You can be ex- transgender, gay, bisexual, in action, but not in desire.

Coming across a post entitled “Transsexual Fraud” at Trading My Sorrows.com blog, reminded me of my ex-trans past. With the media exposure and growing cultural acceptance of a more fluid gender identity, I’m sure that these types of online ministries will pop up more and more (to join Reality Resources and New Hope Outreach).

Christ said:

“Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.” - Matthew 15-20

The ex-trangender life I experienced was anything but peaceful, truthful, or accepting. My hope is that my fellow human beings who are dealing with the challenges that come along with gender identity variance look at the “fruit” of their life and decide to follow the path which is the most fertile for fruit to grow.

In the end I’m not really ex-ex- anything. I’m me. I hope that anyone that in my situation finds a path to this much peace and truth. I hope they find an orchard full of the fruit like the one that continues to fill my life with blessing after blessing.

Jun. 2nd, 2007

not a pretty girl

Radical Feminist Christ

Originally published at Transadvocate. Please leave any comments there.

shesus.gifUntil someone puts actual empirical data along side radical feminist doctrine, I refuse to call it a theory. It  isn’t a theory, it’s a religion. And it’s about as believable as there being a man named Jesus Christ that rose from the dead after three days.

If your wondering, THIS is the genesis of my reason to post.

Now, let us pray.

Apr. 13th, 2007

not a pretty girl

The Man Who Would Be Jester

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

First he said:

* “Homosexual transsexuals tend to have a short time horizon, with certain pleasure in the present worth great risks for the future.”jester.jpg

* “Prostitution is the single most common occupation that homosexual transsexuals in our study admitted to.”

* “The more resourceful and attractive transsexual prostitutes are call girls.”

* “Nearly all the homosexual transsexuals I know work as escorts after they have their surgery.”

* “As for shoplifting, homosexual transsexuals are not especially well suited as much as especially motivated. For many, their taste in clothing is much more expensive than their income allows.”

* “Do they get married? … homosexual transsexuals are not very successful at finding desirable men willing to commit to them.”

* “When I began writing this book, I had never known a homosexual transsexual who married.”

* “They wanted to get their surgery (if they had not had it yet) and meet a nice, attractive, and financially stable heterosexual man who would marry them and take care of them … When I was conducting my study of homosexual transsexuals, I routinely asked them if they knew anyone who had realized this dream. No one did.”

* “Many of the transsexuals we interviewed in the course of this study were more attractive than the average genetic female.”

* “Gay transsexuals are boy crazy.”

* “When I have discussed the theory that homosexual transsexuals are a type of gay man, I have met resistance. I was surprised at this, for the idea is neither new nor, it seemed to me, controversial.”

- excerpts from “The Man Who Would Be Queen; The science of gender-bending and transsexualism”

But erasing transwomen isn’t enough! Next stop, bisexualville, … all aboard!!!

[kml_flashembed movie=”http://www.youtube.com/v/8b-4shDxUlw” width=”425″ height=”350″/]

* Although there are clearly men who call themselves “bisexual” and who have sex with both men and women, both scientists and laypeople have long been skeptical that men with bisexual arousal patterns exist. Kurt Freund, who invented penile plethysmography, related that he was never able to find a subset of men who appeared to be bisexual in the lab. Although their data are less scientific, gay men share Freund’s skepticism. They have a saying: “You’re either gay, straight, or lying.” In contrast, many women are bisexual, at least in their sexual arousal patterns.

O.K., So what’s the latest from our favorite quack/scientist/jester, J. Michael Bailey?

“Whether women describe themselves as straight or lesbian, “Their sexual
arousal seems to be relatively indiscriminate - they get aroused by both male and female images,” Dr. Bailey said. “I’m not even sure females have a sexual orientation. But they have sexual preferences. Women are very picky, and most choose to have sex with men.” -J. Michael Bailey
- Pas de Deux of Sexuality Is Written in the Genes

How can anyone take this man seriously anymore?

I guess you “lesbians” out there just need a good piece of manhood, and you’ll go straight.

Sorry, I can’t help ya though, I gotta go sex myself up, turn a few tricks, then settle down with a nice man.

Um, ya.
- h/t Scientific American

Apr. 12th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Nappy Hoe’s and Presidential Faggots

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

In my post, “Just Wondering” I asked where the outrage was concerning Michael Savage’s attack on on transgender people. It’s two weeks later, and I’m still asking myself the same question.

Ann Coulter - Called one man a faggot.

Don Imus - Called a team “nappy headed hoes.”

Michael Savage - Called a murdered transwoman a psycho freak. “Yeah, process of becoming a woman — psychopath. [She] should have been in a back ward in a straitjacket for years, howling on major medication.” “But you know what? You’re never gonna make me respect the freak. I don’t want to respect the freak. The freak ought to be glad that they’re allowed to walk around without begging for something.

Ann Coulter’s punishment - Net Bank, Verizon, Washington Mutual, AT&T/Cingular, Dollar Rent-A-Car, SmileTrain.org, University of Phoenix, Sallie Mae, LasikPlus, Power Chord Academy, Gulf Shores.com/Alabama Gulf Coast Convention and Visitors Bureau, Ulta.com, and Yellow Pages.com  all stopped advertising at Coulter’s web site. The Oakland Press , The Mountain Press, The Times of Shreveport, La, The American Press, and  the Lancaster New Era have stopped publishing her columns.  HRC started a letter writing campaign to other papers that carry her. 

Don Imus - Staples Inc., Bigelow Tea, and Procter & Gamble pulled advertising.  MSNBC removed Imus in the Morning completely. CBS Radio suspended him for two weeks. There was even a protest on the campus of  Rutgers University.

Michael Savage-

That’s right, not one repercussion. No press release. No protest. No outrage. Nothing.

GLAAD? HRC? NGLTF? NCTE? GPAC? ANYONE?

Hello?

cry.jpg

Mar. 26th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Just wondering…

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

Why has GLAAD make such a big deal about Ann Coulter’s slur of John Edwards and the Superbowl candy bar commercial, but has been silent on Michael Savage’s rampage against transgender men and women.

Their front page features this:

untitled-1.jpg

But where is the same call to action against those stations that carry Savage? His comments are MUCH WORSE than anything that has come out of the mouth of Coulter.

http://transadvocate.com/files/2007/03/savage-20070323.mp3

SAVAGE: The wages of sin are death. You’re gonna cut off your willy, you’re gonna walk around in women’s clothes, you’re gonna hook — you’re gonna wind up dead under a freeway, Johnson. It’s not gonna be an HBO special about your travails, and how surgery made you a happy woman.

I never understand these people. Guy is 55 years old, he had three children, he discovers there was a woman within, and he goes — shots and hormones, three years of hormones, and live like a woman. And then you gotta dress like a woman for two years. And then they go to a psychopathic, sadistic doctor who does the thing for them. No more in Denmark — I mean, the capital of it is somewhere in Colorado, of course, near Columbine. You wonder why the kids shoot each other there with black raincoats. But that’s the sex change capital of the world — in America, rather — is somewhere in Colorado; they cut off the willies and they put on the willies, depending on whether you’re a Johnny or a Jane.

And apparently it costs more to put a willy on than it does to take a willy off. I’ve always said if a city’s gonna pay for this kind of insane self-mutilation, the least they could do is put a willy on ice. I mean, if they’re taking a perfectly good willy off a guy, why throw it in the garbage? Put it on ice, save it for the next time one of these psycho women in the city wants to be willied, I mean wants to be a John when she’s a Jane. Because it costs like 40 grand to put one on and 20 grand to take one off. I would say you can do a mean price of 30 grand if they could start saving the willies from these psychos. But that’s a separate story. I’m into cost saving at all costs. - transcript and audio via Media Matters here.”

or this: http://transadvocate.com/files/2007/03/savage-20070321.mp3

SAVAGE: And then they go into “she said transgender victims” going on and on “extremely violent” going on and on “are frequently left partially clothed or completely nude, it’s making a statement and humiliating the victim,” blah-blah-blah. I am so beyond fed up with freaks. I live in freak city. You know, I don’t mind freaks. I used to go to Ringling Brothers when I was a little kid, and the freak show was my favorite part of the circus. I didn’t go there to mock them. I liked to see the one-breasted man. I liked to see the mustached woman. But when I wake up as an adult and I find out that they’re actually all Democrats today, passing themselves off as normal, I’m sorry, someone’s gotta say this is a freak show, time out. And what’s this sympathy, constant sympathy for sexually confused people? Why should we have constant sympathy for people who are freaks in every society? I didn’t say hurt the freaks. I didn’t say do anything to the freaks.

But you know what? You’re never gonna make me respect the freak. I don’t want to respect the freak. The freak ought to be glad that they’re allowed to walk around without begging for something. You know, I’m sick and tired of the whole country begging, bending over backwards for the junkie, the freak, the pervert, the illegal immigrant. All of them are better than everybody else. Sick. Everything is upside down. - transcript and audio via Media Matters here.”

Where is the outrage?

Mar. 18th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Little Ole’ Bigot

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

A southern, right-wing, anti-abortion, Dominionist bigot recently wrote this post denouncing Joanne Nemecek for supporting her spouse in transition. I’m not sure she’ll actually let it out of moderation (sooooo typical of right wingnut blogs), so I wanted to post my response here.

“I would be amused (how you support a war that has killed thousands, yet you’re pro-life?…pfftt… too funny), if this wasn’t all so pathetic. First of all, I love your use of idols (a representation or symbol of an object of worship; ie flag and eagle), on this page. Secondly, if you’re going to live your life via the Torah, be warned, it is NOT to be dissected.

‘There is to be one law and one ordinance for you and for the alien who sojourns with you.’ - Numbers 15:16

‘Fact is I can criticze her’

I’d first suggest a spell check, then I’d suggest you check 1 Corinthians 5:12-13:

“What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. ‘Expel the wicked man from among you.’”

This was in a letter to A CHURCH, or A BODY OF BELIEVERS. Unless you share the same pew with the Nemeceks, you have NO biblical directive to place judgment on them.

‘I don’t think she’s doing what’s right.. right now what’s right is thinking of those children and what this is doing/showing to them, not keeping the marriage together at ANY cost.’

What you think is irrelevant in light of scripture. Divorce is only acceptable when there has been unfaithfulness. (Matthew 5:32).

I’m not surprised at this kind of talk. You’re not a Christian, you’re a hypocrite that knows nothing of scripture, that has a heart full of hatred (your use of that racist flag is a fine example). You justify your smarmy attitudes through men, not scripture.

I can’t say that I’m at all shocked by this kind of attitude. It’s pick and chose theology at its finest. They’ll rail against homosexuality or crossdressing that is forbidden in the Torah, but how many of them follow the dietary rules called for in Leviticus? Or for that matter the moral punishments for breaking the laws?

Their absurdity reminds me of one of my most favorite sites ever, God Hates Shrimp.com

12piece.gif

Mar. 11th, 2007

not a pretty girl

Where Did I Leave My Crow Bar?

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

The Journal of Lesbian Studies is calling for submissions to the upcoming “Lesbians and Body Image” issue. One of the questions really caught my eye:

crowbar.jpg” What differentiates body image situations where it is seen as desirable to change your attitude (i.e., “accept your body”) vs. where it is seen as desirable to change your body (i.e., transsexual surgery)? What determines whether someone identifies as a butch lesbian or a FTM transsexual?”

Is it possible to ever “accept your body?” There’s a huge difference between wanting to “shed a few pounds” and abhorring your body configuration. Body image is different than gender identity. Body image is how I feel and see myself in my own skin. Gender identity is how the world perceives me. These two things can overlap, but they are distinctly different.

If you’re going to ask if a lesbian could just “accept their body,” then you must ask “could lesbians just accept their heterosexuality”?

I was going to write a long explanation about the difference in sexual orientation, gender identity, but I’d rather ask a question.

What are the differences between:

“sissy”

“nelly queen”

“masculine”

“feminine”

“diesel dyke”

“femme”

“girly”

Discuss.

(this post was inspired by Angry Brown Butch)

(H/T) Plain(s) Feminist

Mar. 2nd, 2007

not a pretty girl

Best. Comment. EVER!

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

If these religionists would just read their Bibles, they would see that God has no problem with making a woman out of a man. In fact, He was the first to do it.” - Phil, a commenter over at Shakespeare’s Sister.</p>

Phil’s point out of the hypocrisy of the clergy who chose to speak for God at a Largo city commission meeting. City manager, Steve Stanton, was the topic of the nights meeting. Roundly praised for his work, he’s being fired for one reason… he’s decided to transition.

litbrit writes about it in much more detail here and here. (H/T to Mustang Bobby)

Feb. 11th, 2007

not a pretty girl

I Ain’t Got No-Body

Originally published at Transadvocate Blog. Please leave any comments there.

(I wrote this post a while ago, but forgot to put it up.)

Call it synchronicity or blind luck, but at times multiple posts converge into one line of thinking for me. The Kim Nixon case is one such intersection. Ms. Nixon was rejected from the Vancouver Rape Relief Society training program when they found out that she was transgender. Ms. Nixon brought a suit against the center. You can read more about that here and here.

I found the Rape Relief’s argument interesting.

“While it may appear that Rape Relief discriminated against Nixon because she was born with a penis, they have a different rationale. Rape Relief’s collective belief is that far beyond a person’s biological make-up, socialization and experience are what shapes individuals. It’s part of their philosophy that women experience the male-dominated world differently than men. That was the 34-year-old organization’s original argument for why they should be allowed to exclude men when their women-only policy was first challenged in the 1970s, and they feel it’s relevant to whether they should admit transsexual women.” - queerty.com

Rape Relief’s stated belief that socialization and experience seems logical but further inspection brings many questions to the surface. When counseling a rape victim, does one need to have experienced the crime, the life, or the upbringing of the victim? It would seem to me that the counseling skills of the person would be most important, not any personal background.

Over at - Women’s Space/The Margins, Heart makes the argument that it isn’t possible for women to discriminate.

“Except that nobody, including VRR has discriminated against transpeople. In my view it is not possible for females to discriminate against transpeople. That’s the province of men and only men.”

“But it’s for the reasons I provided there that in my view females (women born female who have lived all of their lives as girls and women) cannot “discriminate” against transpersons. They can be nasty and mean. They can be unkind and assholish. But they can’t “discriminate”– because discrimination is a function of power, and females/women (born female who have lived all of their lives as girls/women), in fact have not, and do not, enjoy sex privilege with respect to transpersons. They may enjoy race privilege/class privilege/non-disabled privilege/privilege based on being heterosexual instead of lesbian/thin privilege, but they don’t enjoy sex privilege.”

I’m not sure how Heart comes to this conclusion. As far as the social ladder goes, the only thing lower than a transwoman, is a transwoman of color. Out trans-women have given up male privilege and aren’t accepted  wholly as women. Transwomen don’t even have female privilege. As I said in this post, power is hierarchical.

The Rape Relief’s argument that socialization and experience are key in rape counciling would suggest that trans-women (or men) are never victims of sexual violence. It also suggests that transwomen don’t live under the same threat of sexual violence (actually transwomen, as a group, are more likely to be raped and murdered). Using Rape Relief’s argument, you could exclude women of color. Without the benefit of white privilege they most definitely have a different socialization and experience. Sure there are similarities, but there are similarities in a transwoman’s life too that are common among women.

The question in this case wasn’t whether Kim is a woman or not. It’s a question of whether or not a group can discriminate in choosing their volunteers. The answer? Yes. Under Canada’s Section 41, a non-profit with the “promotion of the interests and welfare of an identifiable group or class of persons” they can pick and choose who they can hire.

Do I think it’s fair or just? No. But it is the law.

Now why did I mention convergence in the first paragraph? Because men’s rights activists have been attacking me over a post I wrote over on my personal site. One of their sites drew my ire because of its insinuation that women often “cry rape.”

On one side, I have women born women (wbw) intimating that transwomen aren’t really experienced enough to know the life long oppression that it takes to be a “real woman.” On the other end I have MRA’s saying “Of course with your infinite wisdom as a woman I guess a man doesn’t have to say anything. You just ‘know’ right? That’s pathetic. What you ‘think’ is not evidence. Get that into your head.”

I wonder why transfolk feel isolated in this culture? ;)

Interesting reading on this case and the response to Heart can be found here:

http://www.thetyee.ca/News/2007/02/03/Nixon/

http://www.queerty.com/queer/news/trannie-injustice-20070205.php?rss
http://guyaneseterror.blogspot.com/2007/02/bingo.html
http://vegpookie.wordpress.com/2007/02/04/why-did-this-surprise-me-in-the-least/
http://www.ninepearls.com/article/224/privilege-and-the-oppression-olympics

Jan. 9th, 2007

not a pretty girl

To The Radical Feminism Transhaters…

Originally published at Marti Abernathey.com. You can comment here but Marti feels more love if you comment there. Registration is no longer required.

I’ll even go further than brownfemipower did with her FUCK YOU post… KISS MY FAT FUCKING TRANNY ASS.

I really am sick of reading this fucking bullshit. I didn’t just walk into this and decide, YA KNOW, I WANT TO CUT MY DICK OFF! Truth is, I hate the testosterone that cycles through my body. It makes me feel fucking nuts. Taking estrogen and blocking testosterone make me feel centered, and focused, and right. If I could, I’d just cut my testicles off and be done with it. In a Utopian world, I’d be able to do that and not be FUCKING ASSAULTED because I want to piss. I’d not have to make a choice between jail and being murdered or raped, or worse.

For you that want to play the victimization game has the patriarchal system in this country told you that because your a radical feminist that you:
CANT SEE YOUR CHILD?
HAVE BEEN PASSED OVER 16 TIMES, AND BE QUALIFIED FOR EVERY FUCKING ONE?
HAVE BEEN MADE FUN OF AT WORK BECAUSE YOUR A RADICAL FEMINIST?
HAD PICTURES OF YOU PUT UP AT WORK THAT HAD SHITTY COMMENTS ON THEM?
HAVE BEEN THE FREAK THAT PEOPLE COME DOWN TO YOUR DEPARTMENT GAWK AT?

I have.

You can talk of utopias, and women’s only spaces. You can talk of PIE IN THE FUCKING SKY. How many women were murdered last year because they were radical feminists? How many radical feminists have had their genitals chopped off and shoved in their mouth?

I’d love it if cops wouldn’t victimize me if they found out I wasn’t female…
or paramedics would still give me medical treatment so I don’t’ die on the goddamn pavement,
I’d love it if it didn’t matter to every person in a foreign country that would see my passport wouldn’t care that i look female but have male genitals.

Don’t talk to me about victimization.
Don’t talk to me about sexual assault.
Don’t talk to me about discrimination.
Don’t talk to me about being fucked by the patriarch.
I’ve lived it.

The world isn’t Utopia.

Our victimisation is real. Our suffering is real.

and to you that don’t care:

You can kiss my estrogen filled, cellulite lined, stretch marked ass.

(NOT WORK SAFE)

Read the rest of this entry » )

Sep. 9th, 2006

not a pretty girl

Is This Headline Offensive?

Originally published at Marti Abernathey.com. You can comment here or there.

Kids Must Take Classes from a Black Teacher

Kids Must Take Classes from a Jew Teacher

Kids Must Take Classes from Christian Teacher

Kids Must Take Classes from Asian Teacher

Kids Must Take Classes from Disabled Teacher

Kids Must Take Classes from Blind Teacher

Why isn’t this considered offensive?

Kids Must Take Classes from Transsexual Teacher

and

School Refuses Student Transfers from Transsexual Teacher’s Classroom

Also, I find it amusing and typical that neither site allows comments. Obviously they don’t like debate, then they would have to support their arguments with something besides rhetoric.

</p>

Jul. 18th, 2006

not a pretty girl

Blame It On the Rain…

Originally published at Marti Abernathey.com. You can comment here but Marti feels more love if you comment there. Registration is no longer required.

http://www.transadvocate.com/audio/transliving.mp3

Sometimes I hate living in this place and time…
http://www.transadvocate.com/audio/transliving.mp3
to my LJ readers, if you want to listen to this, my website has a flash audio player to play it on the site.

not a pretty girl

October 2009

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Advertisement

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com